Pri­va­cy Poli­cy

We are very deligh­ted that you have shown inte­rest in our enter­pri­se. Data pro­tec­tion is of a par­ti­cu­lar­ly high prio­ri­ty for the manage­ment of the Mey­er-Soft­ware. The use of the Inter­net pages of the Mey­er-Soft­ware is pos­si­ble wit­hout any indi­ca­ti­on of per­so­nal data; howe­ver, if a data sub­ject wants to use spe­cial enter­pri­se ser­vices via our web­site, pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data could beco­me neces­sa­ry. If the pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data is neces­sa­ry and the­re is no sta­tu­to­ry basis for such pro­ces­sing, we gene­ral­ly obtain con­sent from the data sub­ject.

The pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data, such as the name, address, e‑mail address, or tele­pho­ne num­ber of a data sub­ject shall always be in line with the Gene­ral Data Pro­tec­tion Regu­la­ti­on (GDPR), and in accordance with the coun­try-spe­ci­fic data pro­tec­tion regu­la­ti­ons appli­ca­ble to the Mey­er-Soft­ware. By means of this data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on, our enter­pri­se would like to inform the gene­ral public of the natu­re, scope, and pur­po­se of the per­so­nal data we coll­ect, use and pro­cess. Fur­ther­mo­re, data sub­jects are infor­med, by means of this data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on, of the rights to which they are entit­led.

As the con­trol­ler, the Mey­er-Soft­ware has imple­men­ted num­e­rous tech­ni­cal and orga­niza­tio­nal mea­su­res to ensu­re the most com­ple­te pro­tec­tion of per­so­nal data pro­ces­sed through this web­site. Howe­ver, Inter­net-based data trans­mis­si­ons may in prin­ci­ple have secu­ri­ty gaps, so abso­lu­te pro­tec­tion may not be gua­ran­teed. For this reason, every data sub­ject is free to trans­fer per­so­nal data to us via alter­na­ti­ve means, e.g. by tele­pho­ne.

Defi­ni­ti­ons

The data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on of the Mey­er-Soft­ware is based on the terms used by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor for the adop­ti­on of the Gene­ral Data Pro­tec­tion Regu­la­ti­on (GDPR). Our data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on should be legi­ble and under­stan­da­ble for the gene­ral public, as well as our cus­to­mers and busi­ness part­ners. To ensu­re this, we would like to first explain the ter­mi­no­lo­gy used.

In this data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on, we use, inter alia, the fol­lo­wing terms:

a) Per­so­nal data

Per­so­nal data means any infor­ma­ti­on rela­ting to an iden­ti­fied or iden­ti­fia­ble natu­ral per­son (“data sub­ject”). An iden­ti­fia­ble natu­ral per­son is one who can be iden­ti­fied, direct­ly or indi­rect­ly, in par­ti­cu­lar by refe­rence to an iden­ti­fier such as a name, an iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on num­ber, loca­ti­on data, an online iden­ti­fier or to one or more fac­tors spe­ci­fic to the phy­si­cal, phy­sio­lo­gi­cal, gene­tic, men­tal, eco­no­mic, cul­tu­ral or social iden­ti­ty of that natu­ral per­son.

b) Data sub­ject

Data sub­ject is any iden­ti­fied or iden­ti­fia­ble natu­ral per­son, who­se per­so­nal data is pro­ces­sed by the con­trol­ler respon­si­ble for the pro­ces­sing.

c) Pro­ces­sing

Pro­ces­sing is any ope­ra­ti­on or set of ope­ra­ti­ons which is per­for­med on per­so­nal data or on sets of per­so­nal data, whe­ther or not by auto­ma­ted means, such as coll­ec­tion, recor­ding, orga­ni­sa­ti­on, struc­tu­ring, sto­rage, adapt­a­ti­on or altera­ti­on, retrie­val, con­sul­ta­ti­on, use, dis­clo­sure by trans­mis­si­on, dis­se­mi­na­ti­on or other­wi­se making available, ali­gnment or com­bi­na­ti­on, rest­ric­tion, era­su­re or des­truc­tion.

d) Rest­ric­tion of pro­ces­sing

Rest­ric­tion of pro­ces­sing is the mar­king of stored per­so­nal data with the aim of limi­ting their pro­ces­sing in the future.

e) Pro­fil­ing

Pro­fil­ing means any form of auto­ma­ted pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data con­sis­ting of the use of per­so­nal data to eva­lua­te cer­tain per­so­nal aspects rela­ting to a natu­ral per­son, in par­ti­cu­lar to ana­ly­se or pre­dict aspects con­cer­ning that natu­ral per­son’s per­for­mance at work, eco­no­mic situa­ti­on, health, per­so­nal pre­fe­ren­ces, inte­rests, relia­bi­li­ty, beha­viour, loca­ti­on or move­ments.

f) Pseud­ony­mi­sa­ti­on

Pseud­ony­mi­sa­ti­on is the pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data in such a man­ner that the per­so­nal data can no lon­ger be attri­bu­ted to a spe­ci­fic data sub­ject wit­hout the use of addi­tio­nal infor­ma­ti­on, pro­vi­ded that such addi­tio­nal infor­ma­ti­on is kept sepa­ra­te­ly and is sub­ject to tech­ni­cal and orga­ni­sa­tio­nal mea­su­res to ensu­re that the per­so­nal data are not attri­bu­ted to an iden­ti­fied or iden­ti­fia­ble natu­ral per­son.

g) Con­trol­ler or con­trol­ler respon­si­ble for the pro­ces­sing

Con­trol­ler or con­trol­ler respon­si­ble for the pro­ces­sing is the natu­ral or legal per­son, public aut­ho­ri­ty, agen­cy or other body which, alo­ne or joint­ly with others, deter­mi­nes the pur­po­ses and means of the pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data; whe­re the pur­po­ses and means of such pro­ces­sing are deter­mi­ned by Uni­on or Mem­ber Sta­te law, the con­trol­ler or the spe­ci­fic cri­te­ria for its nomi­na­ti­on may be pro­vi­ded for by Uni­on or Mem­ber Sta­te law.

h) Pro­ces­sor

Pro­ces­sor is a natu­ral or legal per­son, public aut­ho­ri­ty, agen­cy or other body which pro­ces­ses per­so­nal data on behalf of the con­trol­ler.

i) Reci­pi­ent

Reci­pi­ent is a natu­ral or legal per­son, public aut­ho­ri­ty, agen­cy or ano­ther body, to which the per­so­nal data are dis­c­lo­sed, whe­ther a third par­ty or not. Howe­ver, public aut­ho­ri­ties which may recei­ve per­so­nal data in the frame­work of a par­ti­cu­lar inquiry in accordance with Uni­on or Mem­ber Sta­te law shall not be regard­ed as reci­pi­ents; the pro­ces­sing of tho­se data by tho­se public aut­ho­ri­ties shall be in com­pli­ance with the appli­ca­ble data pro­tec­tion rules accor­ding to the pur­po­ses of the pro­ces­sing.

j) Third par­ty

Third par­ty is a natu­ral or legal per­son, public aut­ho­ri­ty, agen­cy or body other than the data sub­ject, con­trol­ler, pro­ces­sor and per­sons who, under the direct aut­ho­ri­ty of the con­trol­ler or pro­ces­sor, are aut­ho­ri­sed to pro­cess per­so­nal data.

k) Con­sent

Con­sent of the data sub­ject is any free­ly given, spe­ci­fic, infor­med and unam­bi­guous indi­ca­ti­on of the data sub­jec­t’s wis­hes by which he or she, by a state­ment or by a clear affir­ma­ti­ve action, signi­fies agree­ment to the pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data rela­ting to him or her.

Name and Address of the con­trol­ler

Con­trol­ler for the pur­po­ses of the Gene­ral Data Pro­tec­tion Regu­la­ti­on (GDPR), other data pro­tec­tion laws appli­ca­ble in Mem­ber sta­tes of the Euro­pean Uni­on and other pro­vi­si­ons rela­ted to data pro­tec­tion is:

Mey­er-Soft­ware – Ent­wick­lung und Bera­tung

Wen­ne­bos­te­ler Hof 14

30855 Lan­gen­ha­gen

Deutsch­land

Tel.: +49 511–7248707

E‑Mail: info(at)pallas-ams(dot)de

Web­site: www.pallas-ams.de

Coll­ec­tion of gene­ral data and infor­ma­ti­on

The web­site of the Mey­er-Soft­ware coll­ects a series of gene­ral data and infor­ma­ti­on when a data sub­ject or auto­ma­ted sys­tem calls up the web­site. This gene­ral data and infor­ma­ti­on are stored in the ser­ver log files. Coll­ec­ted may be (1) the brow­ser types and ver­si­ons used, (2) the ope­ra­ting sys­tem used by the acces­sing sys­tem, (3) the web­site from which an acces­sing sys­tem rea­ches our web­site (so-cal­led refer­rers), (4) the sub-web­sites, (5) the date and time of access to the Inter­net site, (6) an Inter­net pro­to­col address (IP address), (7) the Inter­net ser­vice pro­vi­der of the acces­sing sys­tem, and (8) any other simi­lar data and infor­ma­ti­on that may be used in the event of attacks on our infor­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gy sys­tems.

When using the­se gene­ral data and infor­ma­ti­on, the Mey­er-Soft­ware does not draw any con­clu­si­ons about the data sub­ject. Rather, this infor­ma­ti­on is nee­ded to (1) deli­ver the con­tent of our web­site cor­rect­ly, (2) opti­mi­ze the con­tent of our web­site as well as its adver­ti­se­ment, (3) ensu­re the long-term via­bi­li­ty of our infor­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gy sys­tems and web­site tech­no­lo­gy, and (4) pro­vi­de law enforce­ment aut­ho­ri­ties with the infor­ma­ti­on neces­sa­ry for cri­mi­nal pro­se­cu­ti­on in case of a cyber-attack. The­r­e­fo­re, the Mey­er-Soft­ware ana­ly­zes anony­mously coll­ec­ted data and infor­ma­ti­on sta­tis­ti­cal­ly, with the aim of incre­asing the data pro­tec­tion and data secu­ri­ty of our enter­pri­se, and to ensu­re an opti­mal level of pro­tec­tion for the per­so­nal data we pro­cess. The anony­mous data of the ser­ver log files are stored sepa­ra­te­ly from all per­so­nal data pro­vi­ded by a data sub­ject.

Cont­act pos­si­bi­li­ty via the web­site

Due to legal regu­la­ti­ons, the Mey­er-Soft­ware web­site con­ta­ins infor­ma­ti­on that enables quick elec­tro­nic cont­act to our com­pa­ny as well as direct com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on with us, which also includes a gene­ral address of the so-cal­led elec­tro­nic mail (e‑mail address). If a data sub­ject cont­acts the con­trol­ler by email or via a cont­act form, the per­so­nal data trans­mit­ted by the data sub­ject are auto­ma­ti­cal­ly stored. Such per­so­nal data trans­mit­ted on a vol­un­t­a­ry basis by a data sub­ject to the con­trol­ler are stored for the pur­po­se of pro­ces­sing or cont­ac­ting the data sub­ject. The­re is no trans­fer of this per­so­nal data to third par­ties.

Rou­ti­ne era­su­re and blo­cking of per­so­nal data

The data con­trol­ler shall pro­cess and store the per­so­nal data of the data sub­ject only for the peri­od neces­sa­ry to achie­ve the pur­po­se of sto­rage, or as far as this is gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor or other legis­la­tors in laws or regu­la­ti­ons to which the con­trol­ler is sub­ject to.

If the sto­rage pur­po­se is not appli­ca­ble, or if a sto­rage peri­od pre­scri­bed by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor or ano­ther com­pe­tent legis­la­tor expi­res, the per­so­nal data are rou­ti­ne­ly blo­cked or era­sed in accordance with legal requi­re­ments.

Rights of the data sub­ject

a) Right of con­fir­ma­ti­on

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler the con­fir­ma­ti­on as to whe­ther or not per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her are being pro­ces­sed. If a data sub­ject wis­hes to avail hims­elf of this right of con­fir­ma­ti­on, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the con­trol­ler.

b) Right of access

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler free infor­ma­ti­on about his or her per­so­nal data stored at any time and a copy of this infor­ma­ti­on. Fur­ther­mo­re, the Euro­pean direc­ti­ves and regu­la­ti­ons grant the data sub­ject access to the fol­lo­wing infor­ma­ti­on:

  • the pur­po­ses of the pro­ces­sing;
  • the cate­go­ries of per­so­nal data con­cer­ned;
  • the reci­pi­ents or cate­go­ries of reci­pi­ents to whom the per­so­nal data have been or will be dis­c­lo­sed, in par­ti­cu­lar reci­pi­ents in third count­ries or inter­na­tio­nal orga­ni­sa­ti­ons;
  • whe­re pos­si­ble, the envi­sa­ged peri­od for which the per­so­nal data will be stored, or, if not pos­si­ble, the cri­te­ria used to deter­mi­ne that peri­od;
  • the exis­tence of the right to request from the con­trol­ler rec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on or era­su­re of per­so­nal data, or rest­ric­tion of pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning the data sub­ject, or to object to such pro­ces­sing;
  • the exis­tence of the right to lodge a com­plaint with a super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ty;
  • whe­re the per­so­nal data are not coll­ec­ted from the data sub­ject, any available infor­ma­ti­on as to their source;
  • the exis­tence of auto­ma­ted decis­i­on-making, inclu­ding pro­fil­ing, refer­red to in Artic­le 22(1) and (4) of the GDPR and, at least in tho­se cases, meaningful infor­ma­ti­on about the logic invol­ved, as well as the signi­fi­can­ce and envi­sa­ged con­se­quen­ces of such pro­ces­sing for the data sub­ject.

Fur­ther­mo­re, the data sub­ject shall have a right to obtain infor­ma­ti­on as to whe­ther per­so­nal data are trans­fer­red to a third coun­try or to an inter­na­tio­nal orga­ni­sa­ti­on. Whe­re this is the case, the data sub­ject shall have the right to be infor­med of the appro­pria­te safe­guards rela­ting to the trans­fer.

If a data sub­ject wis­hes to avail hims­elf of this right of access, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the con­trol­ler.

c) Right to rec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler wit­hout undue delay the rec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on of inac­cu­ra­te per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her. Taking into account the pur­po­ses of the pro­ces­sing, the data sub­ject shall have the right to have incom­ple­te per­so­nal data com­ple­ted, inclu­ding by means of pro­vi­ding a sup­ple­men­ta­ry state­ment.

If a data sub­ject wis­hes to exer­cise this right to rec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the con­trol­ler.

d) Right to era­su­re (Right to be for­got­ten)

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler the era­su­re of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her wit­hout undue delay, and the con­trol­ler shall have the obli­ga­ti­on to era­se per­so­nal data wit­hout undue delay whe­re one of the fol­lo­wing grounds appli­es, as long as the pro­ces­sing is not neces­sa­ry:

  • The per­so­nal data are no lon­ger neces­sa­ry in rela­ti­on to the pur­po­ses for which they were coll­ec­ted or other­wi­se pro­ces­sed.
  • The data sub­ject with­draws con­sent to which the pro­ces­sing is based accor­ding to point (a) of Artic­le 6(1) of the GDPR, or point (a) of Artic­le 9(2) of the GDPR, and whe­re the­re is no other legal ground for the pro­ces­sing.
  • The data sub­ject objects to the pro­ces­sing pur­su­ant to Artic­le 21(1) of the GDPR and the­re are no over­ri­ding legi­ti­ma­te grounds for the pro­ces­sing, or the data sub­ject objects to the pro­ces­sing pur­su­ant to Artic­le 21(2) of the GDPR.
  • The per­so­nal data have been unlawful­ly pro­ces­sed.
  • The per­so­nal data must be era­sed for com­pli­ance with a legal obli­ga­ti­on in Uni­on or Mem­ber Sta­te law to which the con­trol­ler is sub­ject.
  • The per­so­nal data have been coll­ec­ted in rela­ti­on to the offer of infor­ma­ti­on socie­ty ser­vices refer­red to in Artic­le 8(1) of the GDPR.

If one of the afo­re­men­tio­ned reasons appli­es, and a data sub­ject wis­hes to request the era­su­re of per­so­nal data stored by the Mey­er-Soft­ware, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the con­trol­ler. An employee of Mey­er-Soft­ware shall prompt­ly ensu­re that the era­su­re request is com­pli­ed with imme­dia­te­ly.

Whe­re the con­trol­ler has made per­so­nal data public and is obli­ged pur­su­ant to Artic­le 17(1) to era­se the per­so­nal data, the con­trol­ler, taking account of available tech­no­lo­gy and the cost of imple­men­ta­ti­on, shall take reasonable steps, inclu­ding tech­ni­cal mea­su­res, to inform other con­trol­lers pro­ces­sing the per­so­nal data that the data sub­ject has reques­ted era­su­re by such con­trol­lers of any links to, or copy or repli­ca­ti­on of, tho­se per­so­nal data, as far as pro­ces­sing is not requi­red. An employees of the Mey­er-Soft­ware will arran­ge the neces­sa­ry mea­su­res in indi­vi­du­al cases.

e) Right of rest­ric­tion of pro­ces­sing

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler rest­ric­tion of pro­ces­sing whe­re one of the fol­lo­wing appli­es:

  • The accu­ra­cy of the per­so­nal data is con­tes­ted by the data sub­ject, for a peri­od enab­ling the con­trol­ler to veri­fy the accu­ra­cy of the per­so­nal data.
  • The pro­ces­sing is unlawful and the data sub­ject oppo­ses the era­su­re of the per­so­nal data and requests ins­tead the rest­ric­tion of their use ins­tead.
  • The con­trol­ler no lon­ger needs the per­so­nal data for the pur­po­ses of the pro­ces­sing, but they are requi­red by the data sub­ject for the estab­lish­ment, exer­cise or defence of legal claims.
  • The data sub­ject has objec­ted to pro­ces­sing pur­su­ant to Artic­le 21(1) of the GDPR pen­ding the veri­fi­ca­ti­on whe­ther the legi­ti­ma­te grounds of the con­trol­ler over­ri­de tho­se of the data sub­ject.

If one of the afo­re­men­tio­ned con­di­ti­ons is met, and a data sub­ject wis­hes to request the rest­ric­tion of the pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data stored by the Mey­er-Soft­ware, he or she may at any time cont­act any employee of the con­trol­ler. The employee of the Mey­er-Soft­ware will arran­ge the rest­ric­tion of the pro­ces­sing.

f) Right to data por­ta­bi­li­ty

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor, to recei­ve the per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her, which was pro­vi­ded to a con­trol­ler, in a struc­tu­red, com­mon­ly used and machi­ne-rea­da­ble for­mat. He or she shall have the right to trans­mit tho­se data to ano­ther con­trol­ler wit­hout hin­drance from the con­trol­ler to which the per­so­nal data have been pro­vi­ded, as long as the pro­ces­sing is based on con­sent pur­su­ant to point (a) of Artic­le 6(1) of the GDPR or point (a) of Artic­le 9(2) of the GDPR, or on a con­tract pur­su­ant to point (b) of Artic­le 6(1) of the GDPR, and the pro­ces­sing is car­ri­ed out by auto­ma­ted means, as long as the pro­ces­sing is not neces­sa­ry for the per­for­mance of a task car­ri­ed out in the public inte­rest or in the exer­cise of offi­ci­al aut­ho­ri­ty ves­ted in the con­trol­ler.

Fur­ther­mo­re, in exer­cis­ing his or her right to data por­ta­bi­li­ty pur­su­ant to Artic­le 20(1) of the GDPR, the data sub­ject shall have the right to have per­so­nal data trans­mit­ted direct­ly from one con­trol­ler to ano­ther, whe­re tech­ni­cal­ly fea­si­ble and when doing so does not adver­se­ly affect the rights and free­doms of others.

In order to assert the right to data por­ta­bi­li­ty, the data sub­ject may at any time cont­act any employee of the Mey­er-Soft­ware.

g) Right to object

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor to object, on grounds rela­ting to his or her par­ti­cu­lar situa­ti­on, at any time, to pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her, which is based on point (e) or (f) of Artic­le 6(1) of the GDPR. This also appli­es to pro­fil­ing based on the­se pro­vi­si­ons.

The Mey­er-Soft­ware shall no lon­ger pro­cess the per­so­nal data in the event of the objec­tion, unless we can demons­tra­te com­pel­ling legi­ti­ma­te grounds for the pro­ces­sing which over­ri­de the inte­rests, rights and free­doms of the data sub­ject, or for the estab­lish­ment, exer­cise or defence of legal claims.

If the Mey­er-Soft­ware pro­ces­ses per­so­nal data for direct mar­ke­ting pur­po­ses, the data sub­ject shall have the right to object at any time to pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her for such mar­ke­ting. This appli­es to pro­fil­ing to the ext­ent that it is rela­ted to such direct mar­ke­ting. If the data sub­ject objects to the Mey­er-Soft­ware to the pro­ces­sing for direct mar­ke­ting pur­po­ses, the Mey­er-Soft­ware will no lon­ger pro­cess the per­so­nal data for the­se pur­po­ses.

In addi­ti­on, the data sub­ject has the right, on grounds rela­ting to his or her par­ti­cu­lar situa­ti­on, to object to pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her by the Mey­er-Soft­ware for sci­en­ti­fic or his­to­ri­cal rese­arch pur­po­ses, or for sta­tis­ti­cal pur­po­ses pur­su­ant to Artic­le 89(1) of the GDPR, unless the pro­ces­sing is neces­sa­ry for the per­for­mance of a task car­ri­ed out for reasons of public inte­rest.

In order to exer­cise the right to object, the data sub­ject may cont­act any employee of the Mey­er-Soft­ware. In addi­ti­on, the data sub­ject is free in the con­text of the use of infor­ma­ti­on socie­ty ser­vices, and not­wi­th­stan­ding Direc­ti­ve 2002/58/EC, to use his or her right to object by auto­ma­ted means using tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons.

h) Auto­ma­ted indi­vi­du­al decis­i­on-making, inclu­ding pro­fil­ing

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor not to be sub­ject to a decis­i­on based sole­ly on auto­ma­ted pro­ces­sing, inclu­ding pro­fil­ing, which pro­du­ces legal effects con­cer­ning him or her, or simi­lar­ly signi­fi­cant­ly affects him or her, as long as the decis­i­on (1) is not is neces­sa­ry for ente­ring into, or the per­for­mance of, a con­tract bet­ween the data sub­ject and a data con­trol­ler, or (2) is not aut­ho­ri­sed by Uni­on or Mem­ber Sta­te law to which the con­trol­ler is sub­ject and which also lays down sui­ta­ble mea­su­res to safe­guard the data sub­jec­t’s rights and free­doms and legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests, or (3) is not based on the data sub­jec­t’s expli­cit con­sent.

If the decis­i­on (1) is neces­sa­ry for ente­ring into, or the per­for­mance of, a con­tract bet­ween the data sub­ject and a data con­trol­ler, or (2) it is based on the data sub­jec­t’s expli­cit con­sent, the Mey­er-Soft­ware shall imple­ment sui­ta­ble mea­su­res to safe­guard the data sub­jec­t’s rights and free­doms and legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests, at least the right to obtain human inter­ven­ti­on on the part of the con­trol­ler, to express his or her point of view and con­test the decis­i­on.

If the data sub­ject wis­hes to exer­cise the rights con­cer­ning auto­ma­ted indi­vi­du­al decis­i­on-making, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the Mey­er-Soft­ware.

i) Right to with­draw data pro­tec­tion con­sent

Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor to with­draw his or her con­sent to pro­ces­sing of his or her per­so­nal data at any time.

If the data sub­ject wis­hes to exer­cise the right to with­draw the con­sent, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the Mey­er-Soft­ware.

Legal basis for the pro­ces­sing

Art. 6(1) lit. a GDPR ser­ves as the legal basis for pro­ces­sing ope­ra­ti­ons for which we obtain con­sent for a spe­ci­fic pro­ces­sing pur­po­se. If the pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data is neces­sa­ry for the per­for­mance of a con­tract to which the data sub­ject is par­ty, as is the case, for exam­p­le, when pro­ces­sing ope­ra­ti­ons are neces­sa­ry for the sup­p­ly of goods or to pro­vi­de any other ser­vice, the pro­ces­sing is based on Artic­le 6(1) lit. b GDPR. The same appli­es to such pro­ces­sing ope­ra­ti­ons which are neces­sa­ry for car­ry­ing out pre-con­trac­tu­al mea­su­res, for exam­p­le in the case of inqui­ries con­cer­ning our pro­ducts or ser­vices. Is our com­pa­ny sub­ject to a legal obli­ga­ti­on by which pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data is requi­red, such as for the ful­fill­ment of tax obli­ga­ti­ons, the pro­ces­sing is based on Art. 6(1) lit. c GDPR. In rare cases, the pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data may be neces­sa­ry to pro­tect the vital inte­rests of the data sub­ject or of ano­ther natu­ral per­son. This would be the case, for exam­p­le, if a visi­tor were inju­red in our com­pa­ny and his name, age, health insu­rance data or other vital infor­ma­ti­on would have to be pas­sed on to a doc­tor, hos­pi­tal or other third par­ty. Then the pro­ces­sing would be based on Art. 6(1) lit. d GDPR. Final­ly, pro­ces­sing ope­ra­ti­ons could be based on Artic­le 6(1) lit. f GDPR. This legal basis is used for pro­ces­sing ope­ra­ti­ons which are not cover­ed by any of the abo­ve­men­tio­ned legal grounds, if pro­ces­sing is neces­sa­ry for the pur­po­ses of the legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests pur­sued by our com­pa­ny or by a third par­ty, except whe­re such inte­rests are over­ridden by the inte­rests or fun­da­men­tal rights and free­doms of the data sub­ject which requi­re pro­tec­tion of per­so­nal data. Such pro­ces­sing ope­ra­ti­ons are par­ti­cu­lar­ly per­mis­si­ble becau­se they have been spe­ci­fi­cal­ly men­tio­ned by the Euro­pean legis­la­tor. He con­side­red that a legi­ti­ma­te inte­rest could be assu­med if the data sub­ject is a cli­ent of the con­trol­ler (Reci­tal 47 Sen­tence 2 GDPR).

The legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests pur­sued by the con­trol­ler or by a third par­ty

Whe­re the pro­ces­sing of per­so­nal data is based on Artic­le 6(1) lit. f GDPR our legi­ti­ma­te inte­rest is to car­ry out our busi­ness in favor of the well-being of all our employees and the share­hol­ders.

Peri­od for which the per­so­nal data will be stored

The cri­te­ria used to deter­mi­ne the peri­od of sto­rage of per­so­nal data is the respec­ti­ve sta­tu­to­ry reten­ti­on peri­od. After expi­ra­ti­on of that peri­od, the cor­re­spon­ding data is rou­ti­ne­ly dele­ted, as long as it is no lon­ger neces­sa­ry for the ful­fill­ment of the con­tract or the initia­ti­on of a con­tract.

Pro­vi­si­on of per­so­nal data as sta­tu­to­ry or con­trac­tu­al requi­re­ment; Requi­re­ment neces­sa­ry to enter into a con­tract; Obli­ga­ti­on of the data sub­ject to pro­vi­de the per­so­nal data; pos­si­ble con­se­quen­ces of fail­ure to pro­vi­de such data

We cla­ri­fy that the pro­vi­si­on of per­so­nal data is part­ly requi­red by law (e.g. tax regu­la­ti­ons) or can also result from con­trac­tu­al pro­vi­si­ons (e.g. infor­ma­ti­on on the con­trac­tu­al part­ner). Some­ti­mes it may be neces­sa­ry to con­clude a con­tract that the data sub­ject pro­vi­des us with per­so­nal data, which must sub­se­quent­ly be pro­ces­sed by us. The data sub­ject is, for exam­p­le, obli­ged to pro­vi­de us with per­so­nal data when our com­pa­ny signs a con­tract with him or her. The non-pro­vi­si­on of the per­so­nal data would have the con­se­quence that the con­tract with the data sub­ject could not be con­cluded. Befo­re per­so­nal data is pro­vi­ded by the data sub­ject, the data sub­ject must cont­act any employee. The employee cla­ri­fies to the data sub­ject whe­ther the pro­vi­si­on of the per­so­nal data is requi­red by law or con­tract or is neces­sa­ry for the con­clu­si­on of the con­tract, whe­ther the­re is an obli­ga­ti­on to pro­vi­de the per­so­nal data and the con­se­quen­ces of non-pro­vi­si­on of the per­so­nal data.

Exis­tence of auto­ma­ted decis­i­on-making

As a respon­si­ble com­pa­ny, we do not use auto­ma­tic decis­i­on-making or pro­fil­ing.

Deve­lo­ped by the spe­cia­lists for Legal­Tech at Wil­ling & Able that also deve­lo­ped the sys­tem for data pro­tec­tion trai­ning online. The legal texts con­tai­ned in our pri­va­cy poli­cy gene­ra­tor have been pro­vi­ded and published by Prof. Dr. h.c. Hei­ko Jon­ny Manie­ro from the Ger­man Asso­cia­ti­on for Data Pro­tec­tion and Chris­ti­an Sol­me­cke from WBS law.